The Privilege To Be A Malay

I feel much have been said about Privileges, UMNO, Pakatan, Badawi and Malay. The fact remains, privilege in a sense is a blessing. But just like any other blessings in this world, people tend to either under-appreciate it or simply destroy it sub-consciously.

To under appreciate it in the sense of Malay privilege is to not realise it as a blessing. Under appreciate when the blessing is given for us to hold ourself stronger and better in the future. Under appreciate is to undermine it's use as far as the eyes can tell. For instance when a bumiputra sells his share in order to get quick money, as many Malays do, without thinking long term and the effect it would have on the next generation.

To destroy it is to hold on to the privilege as if our life depended on it and fail to understand that in this world the only living that could survive are those who stand by his effort, those who stand by his belief and those who stand by his will.

Yes Malay privilege is necessary...at one point of time. The Malays were under developed compared to the Chinese. Yes they came (just like we did but we were earlier) and prospered. That is the doing of the colonial powers. Malays were given government jobs and administrative work, not much business. Thus, we were in need of a helping hand, hence the privilege. But what does that do in the long term?

Tun Ismail had this to say regarding Malay privilege:

“This proved a less intractable problem because the leaders of the Alliance realised the practical necessity of giving the Malays a handicap if they were to compete on equal terms with the other races. The only point of controversy was the duration of the ’special position’ — should there be a time limit or should it be permanent? I made a suggestion which was accepted, that the question be left to the Malays themselves, because I felt that as more and more Malays became educated and gained self-confidence, they themselves would do away with this ’special position’ because in itself this ’special position’ is a slur on the ability of the Malays and only to be tolerated because it is necessary as a temporary measure to ensure their survival in the modern competitive world: a world to which only those in the urban areas had been exposed.”

Have Malay realized? Have Malay come to expect the undeniable implications of holding on to such privileges? Tun Ismail left the question of limit for us to decide so the question is have we had enough? Isn't this the right time to move forward? I post this entry to question my own race on whether we as a race have reached the height of being undermined by our own self belief and thus are we ready to move on in spite of our shortcomings?

I do not reject every single thing done by UMNO/BN. I may hate them, but historically speaking, great leaders have emerged from that alliance-and great leaders have made flying the flag on Hari Merdeka possible. However, I believe in standing on my own 2 feet, something which the new generation of UMNO leaders fail to understand or propagate.

The question remains, are we standing on the grounds created by UMNO, or are they standing on the grounds which we have red-carpeted for them? In both cases, who is more afraid of losing the other? My personal answer would be, UMNO. UMNO cannot live without our support but we can live without theirs.

Therefore the bigger questions are; Can we make do without privilege after 51 years of Independence? How does one get rid of the privilege without inviting hate and animosity? How do we move from then on?

I believe the answer to the first question is; Yes we can. We have thrived in economy, academics and in other sectors which sets the bar for social achievements. Name any sector and a Malay name would spring to mind. Therefore, are we so indifferent and unable that we must hold on to a mere walking stick? We are 51 yrs old, and in nation age, that's matured enough.

The answer to the second question is, we are not able to get rid of privilege by taking away the subject right away. Those who do not see it as beneficial would definitely not appreciate the sentiment. However, in due time, people will realise. The new generation is growing in stature and intellectual understanding. The need to walk on a stick is a thing of the past. Pakatan holds the key to further our self interest and therefore I look forward to be a part of the new Malay. Not only to rid ourselves of the privilege for being a Malay, but to feel the privilege of being a Malay. That in itself is mightier than any policy.

The third question has been answered by the event which took place on March 8 2008. We are progressing as a race and as a democratic country. Do we need privilege to walk? I walked before I even knew of the word 'privilege'. Therefore progressing is all in the state of mind and as Mahathir said (in an interview with Utusan in 2002):

"Pada saya, yang pertama, itu bukan langkah awal untuk menghapuskan hak istimewa orang Melayu (10% of MRSM for non Malays). Yang kedua, saya anggap hak istimewa orang Melayu adalah satu tongkat. Dan kalau kita selalu guna tongkat, sampai bila pun kita tempang."

Therefore realising that we are walking with a stick is important. Don't you think those who actually do walk with a stick would want to walk without using one? To some of them it is not even possible, but to us, it is as simple as kicking it away. I'm proud to be Malay, I'm proud to celebrate the Nation's 51st Independence Day as a Malay and I'm looking forward to progress with the new Malay.

Remember Allah said:

For each (such person) there are (angels) in succession, before and behind him: They guard him by command of Allah. Verily never will Allah change the condition of a people until they change it themselves (with their own souls). But when (once) Allah willeth a people`s punishment, there can be no turning it back, nor will they find, besides Him, any to protect.

- Ar-Ra'd:11

Selamat Menyambut Hari Kemerdekaan :)

The List That Highlights The Dumb

Yes believe it or not, ever since the March general election (PRU-12) BN has been going all out. I mean really, analyze the situation. You would realise that they are indeed pulling out all stops...to annoy us citizens and make themselves look, sound and feel unsmart!! (not a word)

I mean, look at how they keep on flip flopping over one policy to another. That's obvious as it is. Just go to any blog around and people will point it out. But the thing that make them look really dumb is the fact that they are either oblivious to the surrounding, or just plain ignorant towards what's going on. So in that sense, ignorant/oblivious = not so smart! (tak berapa cerdik!)

Their election campaign during PRU-12 focused on their "achievements" and "contributions". They did not realise that at that moment in time the US is in recession and therefore the economy is definitely faltering. So at that moment in time also, the people are already feeling the effect. Thus, at that moment in time what the people want to hear is...ways you can ease our burden! Instead if they boast on their past, if you think about it, apart from rich people getting richer and buildings getting taller, not everyone felt the effect of their "achievements".

So did they learn? Does a cat learn when you teach it to roll over? The answer to both is no! But at least cats are cute. Hmm can't say the same about anyone in UMNO/BN (I'm not gay...)

During the P.44 by-election they changed strategy. Not that they've learned from what the Pakatan did during PRU-12, they didn't. They changed strategy from boasting to beating. Well at least they tried. Just like when they "tried" to boast during PRU-12, they also "tried" to beat Anwar up. Well more like tried to bury Anwar (yes Mr. Rembau, I'm referring to you). Of course, it didn't work. What is Mr. Rembau's reaction anyway?

Anyway...You see, one thing you gotta teach this BN people is to listen and acknowledge. When they do surveys and the result is 30% of the people's focus is on the economy and stuff, talk about economic easements. When only 11% cares about sodomy, forget even mentioning it laa kan...dumbass.

Now apart from the by-election, several other things brought my attention to the dumbassity (a new word for being tak berapa cerdik) of these people;

First, when road blocks are set up all over the city in order for the police to have the day off away from the stuffy office and to plainly ignore any criminal activities going around.

Second , when a Senior Politician/Minister follows the act of a college dropout by swearing in the mosque even though most, and note I say most, Islamic scholars have told the world over that it's not the right thing to do. Ministers are supposed to be smarter than college a dropout right?

Third, when they don't learn from a particular debate involving a very foamy Minister, that personal attacks won't get you the support from the people. Yes people may cheer for you, but that's only because they are your own people dumbass! So if you want to use the same poor strategy from the debate (which you know you lost heavily) in the by-election, think long and hard what the result is going to be first.

Fourth, when bloggers are censored for being vocal. F.y.i. there are court procedures for slander and defamation. You don't just censor everything. If they say bloggers are stepping over the line when they publish illegal and slanderous stuffs, what about those blogs which contain sexual images? What about those blogs which attacks some Restaurant (giving bad review) and TV shows and celebrities, etc.? It's slanderous and defamatory as well.Be fair laa kan.

Fifth, when they don't realise that their loss is not about bad strategy or that it is just a trend (and to say it's only a trend in P.44?!) or that people do not realise the amount of contribution BN have made or because the bloggers instill bad ideas regarding the government. It's not because of that. It's because you people are corrupt, are always going to be corrupt, are racist, are ignorant and does not look like changing at all. That's why! If you want to win the people over, you can let Pakatan take over and the people will definitely love you. We won't elect you, but we'll appreciate you more...at least.

Sixth, when you people still cannot be appealing to the public en masse. Okay this one is just a cheap shot, but seriously RTM, needs a lot of change! Last year was it the change of image? The only thing interesting is the live telecast of Parliament sitting, but that too last for only 30 minutes and with poor quality at that! The whole of RTM looks like a channel from the 70's stuck in a box but without the colorful disco ball, afro and cool star-shaped glasses. Basically it's 70's in Badawi's home (told you it's a cheap shot).

Seventh, when Government websites looks like it was made using Windows 95. That's all I need to say about that...ugly.

Eighth, when Khairy Jamaluddin and Hisham was sent to P.44 to help BN win the by-election. Hisham shouted "sumpah!!" to scores of PKR supporters during by-election day. 2 days after that Anwar did just that in Parliament. Thanks for the support Hisham!

Ninth, when they deny the fact that anything they do is to save their own arse and ignorant of the fact that people can read through their political motive. E.g. When they proudly announce that JPA and MRSM is 45% and 13% open to non-Bumis, respectively, but then argue their ass off when Khalid suggest that UiTM put 10% quota to non-Bumis. Also an example, the sodomy II case. That is dumbassity on another level which normal humans cannot reach.

Tenth, when they compel me to do this list because I just cannot stand the level of the "tak berapa cerdik"ness.

This list is not exhaustive. Even if you just use the word UMNO/BN and continue with "...plans are..." that would be a great addition to the list already.

Peace :)

The By-Election Reaction (from the losing party)

Here are some of the reactions from the losers. (my version)

Shabery the Foamy said "...(apparently) we expected the lost and that, PP has always been PKR's base anyway so like whatever we knew we're going to lose anyway...like we don't really care 'cos it's the same anyway...it's like the same number of opposition still in parliament anyway. We don't care. Wutevaaa...It's like not a threat to the government anyway. Like wutevaa" (actual report here)
- Cett! Actually expected. Try telling that to Ariff Shah who was so sure of at least 500-5000 majority win. Tell that to Najib who was going all out trying to smear the name of Anwar and said that UMNO can see the trend subsiding. The people are already tired with PKR's rhetoric and starting to come back to BN.

MCA Youth secretary-general Dr Wee Ka Siong said "We 'ave trait ar bes. Yet, we still los. Nest taim ar, we mast change ar stratergi" (actual report here)
- Puuihh! What more do you want to change? The whole BN should change. Change strategy my foot. Let mer refresh; First, they won't touch the sodomy issue. Then they put up a big screen showing nothing but Saiful's swearing and KJ and Najib keep on saying things regarding sodomy. Second, the PM said they won't lower fuel price until the end of the month (after review). But the next day it's down by a mere 15 sen (I'm thankful for it...but still). Third, KJ and Hisham weren't gonna go down to Permatang Pauh as they might stir some controversies. Then they appear day in day out which I must say contributed to the beating. Change strategy? You've done it 10 times in one election!

Sarawak’s Environment and Public Health Minister Datuk Wong Soon Koh said "Anwar should be a responsible MP!. No politicking stuff that's right. Don't play with people's sentiment. You know we do do certain things right Anwar. Not everything we do is wrong tau. Don't criticize on everything laaa. We penat tau. People already voted for us to govern the nation. Leave it be laa. Demokrasi don't touch-touch. I tak larat laa camni" (actual report here)
- Cess! Don't touch on sentiments. Tell that to that Perak opposition (UMNO) lady who said something about snakes an Indian. I'm not gonna say it. Tell that to UMNO Penang chief who has angered even people from their own coalition (MCA) when he touched on Chinese sensitivity (I actually do not know what was said). You say Anwar must uphold democracy and yet you want him to refrain from criticizing a weak government, evident by flip flopped policies and senior ministers getting involved in defaming other people's name? Forget it.

Najib Tun Razak kinda said "We've shown, ehem ehem, that we do, ehem, practise democracy. I personally sent Anwar a message congratulating him and ehem ehem, yeah he replied saying we should work together to build a new Malaysia. It hurt a little but ehem, hei, why would I mind. Anyway, the majority from Azizah to Anwar only increased a little. So ehem, we didn't really feel the pinch. Ehem, okay everyone, back to work. Start planning on how to get this sodomy thing up and ab...I mean, we need to develop the nation now. Ehem..."
- Haha this guy is funny. The majority only increased a littl?. He is ultimately responsible for the increase anyway, regardless whether it's a little or a lot. He is in charge of the election. So HE must take the blame for BN. Just like people are saying Badawi is responsible for March 8, Najib is responsible for P.44. They were poor, rude, abrasive and inconsistent. I thought they aimed to at least lower the majority? With the majority increased, I'm sure you do realise that you are a...

Peace :)

The By-Election

My prediction would be Anwar will win by 17, 000 majority. Wanna bet?

The day has been marred by phantom voters, police beating up an MP, hurling of abuses and what not but I'm sure the day will end with a victory for Anwar...

*************************************************************

Though my previous prediction of Anwar being victorious would definitely come true. The margin it seems would be bigger. Hisham Rais reported that the majority as of 7:59 is ANWAR's 16010 to BN's 6071. This is of course a wonderful mistake made by me as the majority could turn out to be much bigger.

Let's hope BN would be a sore loser and realise their irrelevancy and downhill popularity.

*************************************************************

TV 3 has even announced the winner of the by-election as at 8:10 (I presume). VICTORY TO ANWAR!!! but the majority is not yet known but by the looks of it, it's going to be great. Apparently no BN supporters in sight, the PM has left Penang as early as 6 o'clock due to his ill confidence of the result and Ariff Shah's stronghold (his constituency) has been taken by Anwar.

*************************************************************

The majority has spoken. Hisham Rais reported as so: PKR's 31949 to BN's 14297 is the count at the moment and therefore a very huge majority of 17,652. Anwar will win bigger than I predicted. I'm so proud to be wrong.

*************************************************************

So right now, the majority whether or not BN can come up with the goods late on, would be irrelevant because it will be greater than Wan Azizah's. Because of this fact, we now know that cheap shots, poor strategy and disregarding people's sentiment (and believing only of their own) is not a good mix for a political basis. These are exactly the qualities embedded within UMNO with their rhetorical speech on how Anwar would sell out the Malays, how Anwar is a sodomiser and a corrupt politician, how Anwar is nothing but a dreamer. People don't really take the bait, but for some. Congratulations PM, DPM and UMNO, you just made the world realise how the grass is greener on the other side, or should I say bluer.

*************************************************************

Apparently there were incorrect reports and that the count is actually Anwar - 22,373 and Arif - 9,549 (according to Haris Ibrahim). Still a big majority for Anwar. Ariff can pack his bags and return to his home. He should be thankful that it is probably within walking distance. But since no one will accompany him back (I don't expect Najib, Hisham, Ezam or KJ to stick around), Ariff should not be worried of getting abused.

*************************************************************

Okay that's it Anwar won. The majority is bigger than Azizah's but could be less than my prediction. According to the same source above, the majority is (final but unofficial) 15,534. PKR is currently preparing to celebrate at its HQ in Tropicana. I could just imagine it now, Anwar Ibrahim entering Parliament after 10 years away from it as an MP, the people's elected representative. It is going to be awesome!

*************************************************************

Confirmed result is majority to Anwar by 15,671. Congrats people!

Peace :)

Back to Reality (Convocation ended wiu wiu~)

Today marks the end of the surreal reality and back to the blunt-but-have-to-face-it-like-it-or-not reality. How I dread for this day to come back.

It’s not that I’m not thankful for the blessings that I’ve been given; great job, good pay, good colleagues, a wife and a rented house (even though it’s empty). It’s not that at all. But yesterday was my wife’s convocation, the day before that was mine. It was the final acknowledgment for my hard work (not so much) and dedication (seriously not that much) towards studying for 5 years.

5 years studying a subject which I’m not that interested in; 5 years going through classes which at times bore the hell out of me; 5 years of having to memorize cases which never seemed enough come the examination period; 5 years of not knowing what my life would be after studying but at the same time, not caring.

Sunday was a good day for me. My convocation went well, met some friends and both my mom and my wife saw the proceedings live. My in-laws came and we had lunch and took studio pictures together (you know one with the obviously fake bookshelf at the back).

Monday was equally good if not better than Sunday’s. My wife started the day stressed and under prepared. But ended it with what was expected in such a day, having loads of fun and blessed with lots of memorable moments.

To analyze the day, I would have to say, what makes men succeed is not the material achievement gained by high points or having stars next to their name, but rather it is what those things reflect upon at the end of it all. I'm referring to the system where stars are given for high grading students and the seating arrangement as a result of such system.

I admit to having been blessed with satisfactory results. Not the best, but good enough to get at least a star next to my name. But! It’s not something I really want on the day. Yes I strive for such results and achievement, but on the day itself, I longed to have a good time with my closest friends. Not that I was seated next to my enemies or anything, but everyone has their own close friends, I am no exception.

The ceremony was generally segregated by the stars and the non-stars. My wife was definitely disturbed by this as she is separated from her closest friends because of it.

My wife felt down and under the weather the day of my convocation because she was thinking of the next day (her own convocation). Her result was good. She studied hard for that result but it’s a pity she started late. She only missed the star by a couple decimal points having started lower than that. However, at the end of the day, she got the biggest cheer.

The Pregnant Hon Bun...

She’s pregnant and went up the stage with a highly visible pregnant belly and the people recognize this and cheered for her. I’m pretty sure most of them are her friends and mine. But that cheer really lifted her spirit. She had a great convocation because of it (thanks you guys for the cheer! You don’t know how much that means to me).

So on that day, it’s not the stars that were recognized, rather it’s the person. Everyone was able to succeed in their studies regardless of their result. Everyone was destined for further glory regardless of the result. Everyone was there to stake a claim to their success regardless of the result. So why not give me a chance to sit next to my roommate, my dinner mate, my guitar guru, my childhood friend and so on. Give my wife a chance to sit next to her closest friends, her gossip buddies (not that I condone gossiping) and her midnight studying partners. She deserves it having based her success with the help of these friends.

Me and Ben...

Anyways, reality bites. Disregarding the fact that I was not satisfied with the seating arrangement and obvious segregation, it was a great day. I enjoyed myself. My wife enjoyed her time. If we could do it again we would. But as fate has it, we cannot have it all our way. Back to reality; no more enjoying taking pictures in heavy robes underneath the scorching hot sun ignoring the fact that you’re sweating profusely; no more having a good honest laugh for reasons only those privy would know; no more forgetting what the world is actually like; no more fun as fun should be had.

At least I have a baby to look forward to in 2 months 14 days and 6 hours (according to doctors, me and my wife are convinced it’s going to be less).

At the end of the day...

Peace :)

Tahniah Ustaz Ramlang Porigi

Congratulations to Ustaz Ramlang Porigi for stating the truth of what he believes after being deceived into being in such a place (the swearing in the mosque). I believe this is a new step into the new world where people stand up for their own right and dignity rather than submit to the powers-that-be.

I would like to extend my deepest apology for having reservations into his character and credentials. I stand by my believe that it was a conspiracy but I now know that Ustaz Ramlang Porigi is in fact a victim in this event.

Sorry and congratulations Ustaz Ramlang Porigi.


Here's the video of his interview-part-confession.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1ykQkMtR8U

Evil say Evil do...

How does one show their patriotism? Do they buy people out for projects and commit land scams? Do they bomb other people for the perseverance of their own prospective image ? Do they ride on public transportation after so many years living in Malaysia and at long last decides that it 'should be fixed' as 'it is not good enough'? Some people would probably argue, flying the flag upside down as the most patriotic thing they can do.

I for one do not believe in doing such a thing (flying a flag upside down). Not that it shows how wicked and evil you are, but for me, in a way it shows defeat. The nation is in distress but who are we trying to convince? Whose attention are we trying to lure in giving such distress signals?

For me, the nation being in such distress should encourage us to fly the flag proper and better than before. Why? Because it serves as a reminder. It shows a certain aim. It reminds us of what we are and who we should be. It shows that we need to restore ourselves into such position and battle for such supremacy.

That being said, I do not think that flying it upside down is a mark of disrespect. Sheih explained his stand. Did he use any negative and derogatory remarks towards Malaysia itself? I don't believe he did. To him, it signals distress. I agree on the point of distress but not the conduct. Who are we to say that he is evil? Who are we to say that he is unpatriotic? Some might not even agree on the flying the flag upside down signalling distress, but are we sheih? Who are we to decide what his intentions are?

If a mom stops his fat son from eating too much, and instead have a light 3 course meal per day, would we call that mom a bad mom because she doesn't let him eat like he used to? No, because the mom's intention is known. Sheih made known of his intention and therefore we should respect it. He didn't disrespect the flag, he merely signals his view. Did we say Badawi is an evil person for raising the fuel price by 40% when the community can't even take care of themselves proper? Well I did, but some didn't. His act is acted out with 'good intention' according to him and some others. No one called him evil even though millions are made to suffer by his act and none are made to suffer by sheih's.

Now was Sheih acting with bad intention? He said its a signal for distress and gave example of countries which regards it as a norm. Therefore his intention is clear. According to standard norm, bribery and money politics are evil and bad. But according to UMNO, with 226 complaints to date for their election alone, its a normal practice. For the party that has recorded billions of Ringgit lost for the nation due to corruption alone, that's not evil. So whose to say you're not as evil?

Sheih is not evil, flying the flag upside down to signal distress is not evil, but disregarding the people for your own benefit is. That's your way of flying the flag upside down UMNO, and that one does not signal distress. It has evil written all over it.

Permatang Pauh and the Conpiracies

Now I'm not one who takes upon conspiracy theories like any new age blog junkie. I'm being frank here because some people believes conspiracy theories a bit too easily and it's a bit disheartening. For instance, anything RPK says is true, anything Mahathir says is fact, anything Anwar says is right - by their respective supporters and to a certain extent,worshipers. I'm quite skeptical in accepting 'exposures' so to say, but! because of recent events, like the Permatang Pauh by-election, I'd like to believe there are quite a number of conspiracies revolving around it.

I just would like to give my own take in some of them:

1) The case against the Perak exco by ACA. Don't get me wrong, if they are wrong then go ahead and lock'em up and give them their just deserts. However, the media is playing this whole thing as a very grave matter which undermines the credibility of the Perak government and subsequently, the Pakatan Rakyat. What's the big deal? Well it involves scam. A scam towards a land project which the Perak government says does not exist. If it does not exist then what's the whole hoo-haa is all about?
From what I gather from the media, the ACA nabbed those people involved in the 'scam' based on a complaint made by someone. The ACA nabbed one of the Perak exco member in a hotel and with him there's like RM100k. So basically he is suspected to have been bribed RM100k - this is as portrayed by the media and the ACA.

But!! From what I heard, its not like that at all. One of the exco member was actually caught at a coffee shop somewhere and not in a hotel as reported. The other exco member was actually called to the ACA office for interrogation and thereby he was caught there. So, according to this, there's no truth the report. The Perak government is claiming conspiracy, by none other than UMNO and BN. Tajol Rosli being so desperate to get back into the CM office (remember the PAS incident), one might think that they might just do what is necessary.

So what is the truth? This, in all of its glory, seems to me like a cheap shot to try and undermine the Pakatan Rakyat. Therefore a tactical move to confuse the Permatang Pauh-ian. It's just coincidental that the ACA is able to get their people in the week running up to the election.

Furthermore, I don't believe it is right that our PM seems to suggest that everything done either under investigation or still in proceeding as a done and dusted deal. What I mean is, he shouldn't say certain people are criminal or certain acts are proven crimes until it is actually proven. First, the case of Anwar, where Saiful is the 'victim' even though the SG would beg to differ. Now, the ACA according to him, has done well in reprimanding criminals involved in the Perak scam, a criminal activity. What the hell? They are investigating, the Excos are under investigation so why are they referred to as criminal? I believe there are reports of the PM and DPM being involved in money politics, if they are investigated can we call them criminal? I guess we can!

CERTIFIED!!!

2) With regards to the swearing on the Quran. I've written on this before and I believe and stand by what I believe, that it is not right for Saiful to do so. Not only is it not according to the principles of Syari'ah but it would raise many unanswered questions and bring about many unwanted perception towards the dignity of human beings. That being said, could it be a conspiracy to again undermine Anwar and PR? It might be.

With the by-election just around the corner, it just so happens that Saiful decided to be courages and step up to the plate a day before nomination. Now conspiracy theories goes a long way...and in this case, it does. Now if you look at the picture of the swearing you can see an individual on the left of Saiful looking very pious. His name is, believe it or not, Ramlang Porigi. Yes, this has been reported by Berita Harian and therefore not made up.

Ramlang Porigi looking confused...


Ramlang the JAKIM worker...

Now this website http://www.perisik-rakyat.com/2008/08/sumpah-jembalangsiapa-ramlang-porigi.html did a bit of research on this Ramlang guy and found that this guy is actually a Sabahan who, believe it or not, is registered to vote in Permatang Pauh! He works in JAKIM and is not, and I repeat is NOT an Imam of Masjid Wilayah as claimed (they checked). Now here's the best part, well let the picture tell you the whole story...

Ramlang the UMNO member...

So what does this tell you? Is he in fact a prominent scholar of the Islamic teaching? Is he in fact a big Imam? Its for you to decide. For me...

CERTIFIED!!!

3) It was reported that Najib had given the people nearby the Permatang Pauh constituency a gift. Which is a fund for their Masjid and Surau. Quite a lot of money was thrown and given to each Surau and Masjid. Why now? It's a gift, a gift for the people to show that UMNO cares. Or does it have anything to do with the by-election? Well, obviously. The people in Ijok last year got everything they want; holes on the road covered, road lamps fixed, houses built, temples patched up and everything else done nicely. They won the Ijok by-election then and looking to do the same now in Permatang Pauh. This is not much of a conspiracy, but...

CERTIFIED!!!

That's all for now. Gotta eat. There are also other issues like the voters in Permatang Pauh, the number count, the previous scams allegedly involving Anwar and what not. I believe anything that happens now to undermine Pakatan and Anwar is CERTIFIED CONSPIRACY!!!

Peace :)

I'm Bringing Sexy Back

Haha the title doesn't at all relate to what I'm about to write, but that song has been in my head since 5 o'clock (it is now 6) so I decided to put it to good use. I feel like writing about the by-election. What would be the repercussions if the by-election goes as everyone predicts? Would Anwar be the PM? If he does, what are his actual plans?

I'm just a lay person, knows little about politics and national administration, knows little about economics and whatever else that relates to politics. But I do understand English and Malay, so this is what I gather would happen - according to Anwar.

Anwar is going to become PM. That is what he says. He says he has already got 30 MPs from the ruling coalition. By September 16; that is his promise. After the election, he will lower down the fuel price and put to test the the NEA (New Economic Agenda), an economic policy which does not conform with the affirmative action that is the current economic policy. The NEA would distribute wealth on needs basis rather than base itself on racial lines.

That is exactly what the UMNO people are riding on in order to undermine Anwar. They are saying that Anwar would leave the Malays idle and elevate the status of non-Malays. To what extent is this true? My truth meter says 0% true! Why? Because, needs based policy would not only elevate the status of Malays, being the poorest race in the country, but it would also secure and protect that basis, hence elevating Malaysia to a much more modern developed country.

You see, if we are following the racial based policy, any Malay can receive the benefits. Any! Even the Datuks and Tan Sris would receive unwarranted benefits. And they would surely be the one that gains rather than the whole Malay population (which counts for mostly the poor and middle income majority). This is because when they are Malays, they get benefits. To get these benefits hands on you need cables. Datuk and Tan Sris have cables which not all Malays have and therefore where do the majority stand? On the losing end.

However, if we have the NEA, then it's a different matter (hopefully). It is a needs based policy favoring the needy. So any Mohd, Chong and Subra (Malaysian version of Tom, Dick and Harry) can benefit from it. Given the status of Malay being the most needy in the country (evident by the thousands of needy UiTM student holding protest to declare the neediness of Malays), so Malay stands to benefit the most from this policy. With this policy, corruption won't be at all rampant. Because the wealthy cannot as easily gain from it. Even if they want to gain from it, they have to use the needy and hence the needy stands to benefit. If many wealthyians use enough needyians to gain benefit, then sooner or later every needyians becomes well off enough.

But with the election coming up, how do you suggest I explain this to the people especially the Malays in Permatang Pauh? I'm sure Anwar would do well to explain.

So anyway, apart from the economic policy, what are the other repercussions? Price of oil would definitely go down. Even if some kampung people reiterate what UMNO have so commonly said, the price will definitely go down. Because, apart from the fact that we produce oil, the global oil price are going down (rather rapidly). Even UMNO plans to lower down oil price. So they have no qualms about Anwar wanting to lower down oil price - except that Anwar plans to reduce it much more. That's why we don't usually hear UMNO people talk about oil price nowadays.

Does Anwar have 30 MPs lined up? Perhaps. Jeffery Kitingan have gone on record recently stating that there are 13 MPs willing to cross over immediately after Anwar wins the by-election (only if). Anwar's constant rambling about the 16th September seems to be playing on everyone's mind. He must be speaking the truth...or is he? Saiful also keeps on claiming that he was sodomised but not many believe him. Of course in his case, the claim is so weak that he has people like Badawi trying hard to confuse people (when he himself is surely confused - how can the AG charge not in accordance with his 'message' sent to the media?).

So back to Anwar...I'm sure he has friends in the ruling party willing to cross over but is afraid of the consequence. What if I jump and no one follows? What if I jump and the people gets angry? What if I jump and Anwar jumps the other way? - of course the last thought is rather ridiculous, Anwar is not Ezam (only Ezam can jump either way without a care in the world).

Whatever the case is with the jumping and the change of power, I'm sure we will definitely get an answer before 16th of September. If Anwar does win the election, then if some MPs wants to jump ship then they will. If some do, then we can expect a major exodus by the 16th. Then Anwar can form a government. But if no jumping happens by the end of August, don't be too hopeful fellow Pakatan supporters.

If Pakatan do become the government, then what about UMNO? What about its half brothers, MIC and MCA? Gerakan would definitely jump ship to the Pakatan because they are so useless in a racial based coalition that it does not even make sense why they are still there. They have nothing. Gerakan is more than just beggars in BN (as Tun Lim Keng Yaik said) they are forgotten people - like beggars during the Jurassic period, if there are any (I'd like to think there are).

Can anyone imagine the UMNO people being opposition to the Federal government. They only have Melaka, Perlis, Johor, Negeri 9, Pahang and Terengganu. Sad. Not to disrespect all these states, but apart from Johor, I still see the other states as 'developing'. By the next election, even Terenganu and Perlis might be under Pakatan.

So where does that leave UMNO? I would like to believe that some would repent and join PAS. Some join PKR and let the bad crops stand by UMNO. They would have nothing, just like DAP, PKR and PAS before, but worst because they probably feel that they have power on their hands and that they matter so much - oblivious to the surrounding. I know Tajol Rosli would be crying, Khairy would hold rallies by himself, Najib would flee (somewhere far from Mongolia), Badawi can finally have a good sleep (not on the couch) and Samy Vellu...would still be Samy Vellu (some people just don't get it).

Does Pakatan have the strength to hold themselves together? I'd like believe that once they have the country to look after, they would band together to hold true to the nation's needs, instead of being apprehensive towards one another. That is how I see it. So there, I brought sexy back (I don't know how that is relevant in this context, but put it anyways you want to)

Peace :)

And So he Swears...

Let me first of all state, I am a firm believer of the Syari'ah. I am sure if it is implemented correctly, no one can doubt its effectiveness. I am certain that the Syari'ah is fair and just. To use Syari'ah in certain matters could become a solution to most problems.

Let me move on then to Saiful Bukhari. A college drop out whose future looks bleak. A college drop out whose only gain from the last few months is to have is name printed (and reprinted over and over again) in the MSM. A college drop out who I'm certain is so sure that he would get something out of all these debacle that he would do it for that 'something'. A college drop out who has everything to lose and thus would do anything to win. A college drop out who is a college drop out.

Swearing on the Quran has been put on the offering since the very beginning of this drama. But is it right? Is it the right thing to do? Can you simply swear on something without providing proof? Of course it would be easy to accept that "owh he must really mean it for him to swear on the Quran..." Is it?!

This is exactly what the great Mahathir said. Now let's review. He (chedet) would believe a man whose claim is gradually crumbling with evidence to show the contrary, a man who is only presenting himself at a time when the country is about to change (against his interest) and a man who is using the wrong medium for justice? But he would refute to hell the 600 page investigation on an already material and evidential claim that he is corrupting the judiciary? His words are definitely irrelevant ain't it?

As rightly pointed out by Ustaz Abdul Hadi and Ustaz Haron Din, the swearing is unwarranted. Yes, I've called on Saiful to make good his promise before, but that's just so that he would come out (I already had a feeling that his dead - thank God his not...Haha). I have raised my stand before that the swearing is out of context. You cannot simply swear on the Quran like you're in standard 2 and you don't know better - you know the "janji demi Allah aku tak buat...".

Swearing in Islam as explained by the 2 scholars up there is first of all only in the case of li'an. Whereby a husband/wife accuses his wife/husband of committing zina (adultery). So that's totally out of the question. Secondly, the swearing should first of all be done by the accused person, in this case Anwar. The accuser should first of all provide evidence and proof. But of course Saiful have done nothing to that effect - not even his medical report supports his claim. So if you've failed the first hurdle (li'an) there's no justifying your act.

If I were there at the swearing I would've smacked in him right on the neck. Piaaak! Pleasure...

So anyway...What is his motivation? Knowing full well that the election is only a week away. Doesn't it seem political? I mean if he wants to do it right, at least call on Anwar to witness the swearing. But nope, not done. I'm very disappointed by that religious man sitting beside Saiful. What a shame he got into the act. So I would say, it is highly political. But I would also say, the move backfired.

Has any of you ever seen the Crime Investigation channel? I've seen a whole bunch of episode where the kid gets sodomised/raped once and its traumatic for a lifetime. I mean really to the point that no one can even touch them. No smile on their face, and the shame of telling their story is seen clearly. Saiful just needed 1 day to announce to the world he has been 'touched', 1 month to smile again and 2 months to come out in the open and make a fool of himself. Bravo, call Guiness, we've got a world record holder here.

When I spoke to one police officer regarding this case (a brief word with my friend), I asked him "are you involved this time?". He said, "No, I'm in the comfort zone". Then I asked him if he was involved the last time, directly. He nodded with a sense of shame. Then he said this, "this time I want to accumulate my pahala (reward) and stay clear of dosa (sin). You can see his shame. So that tells me that sodomy I is definitely a set up and sodomy II is take two of the whole drama. In dramas, usually it ends with the hero on top. Now I don't see Saiful as a hero, he seems like a fag. I see Anwar as the Harrison Ford-Richard Gere type. So there's our hero right there.

Some might want to see Anwar take the oath (like Nuraina Samad in her blog), but I say don't. Don't stoop as low as Saiful. If its the course of Syari'ah like Saiful wants and also Najib purports (Najib's statement), then Anwar has taken that step long before. He has already lodged a report to the Islamic officials and waiting further proceedings. So he is already following the rule of Syari'ah law. Najib is wrong in stating that Saiful has followed the Syari'ah. That is not the Syari'ah,and that shows how much Najib knows about the religion he claims to profess. Sumpah laknat is for husband and wife you dodo. Accuser must bring forth proof, witness and evidence. Its simple!

Sufficed to say, the move is unwarranted, political and an act of a desperate man. How much longer do we have to endure reading and thinking what that stupid fellah's intentions are?

Peace :)

A little out of the usual topic

The Improved Gunners

Posted by: wanrahimy

Arsenal last season surprised many. No one expected them to do as well as they did, only to falter at the last hurdle. Remember the common prediction of failing to reach even the top three and would most probably fall behind Tottenham? Well this year, don't make rash predictions again!

Last season was a test for the Gunners. Having lost their inspirational and legendary leader, Henry, I would not blame any of the pundits for writing us off when the whistle hasn't even been blown. But this year, who have we lost?

Yes, argue the fact that the much improved Flamini is gone, Hleb is gone and even the experienced Gilberto is gone. But do realise, even when Flamini was playing as a defensive midfielder, we conceded lots of goals. With Hleb, not much assists and goals were contributed by him. Gilberto wasn't even in the picture last season, sufficed to say, we have not lost pivotal players this season.

Now for with Flamini gone, players like Denilson, Song, Bischoff and Diaby could make a mark. Everyone didn't know Flamini had that missing something in him last season, so don't be surprised if that missing something could also be found in one of these hopefuls. Also, Wenger might be looking for another experienced midfielder, so that is worth the wait - if indeed he buys.

With Hleb gone, the superstar in Walcott is sure to shine. Not to mention Nasri, the French international and Ligue 1 young player of the season coming into the team - he could only do wonders for the club.

The strikers in the team can only improve with the likes of Ade, Persie and Bendtner still of relatively young age. Put Vela and Eduardo into the picture, they've got wealth of goalscoring talent on display.

A slight worry should be on the defense team (including the 'keeper). The two fullbacks are two of the best in the premier league so no worries on that part. It's the central pair. Gallas and Toure look awkward playing together, but I would give them the benefit of the doubt. Last season no one was questioning them until Toure got back from the African Nations Cup. Gallas is always going to have the talent and experience. So there is still a glimmer of hope there. Almunia is gaining confidence on the pitch and that should reflect his performance this season.

All in all, don't write Arsenal off. Most of them are more experienced and have played at the highest level for many years.

And one more thing, we've got a European champion and the most potent and lethal central midfielder in the Premiership with Fabregas.So Mourinho is right in stating that Gunners have got talent, and he should stop at that. Gunners to take the trophy this season, definitely.

-posted on Star blog on 15.8.08

What's Up with the Protesters?

I am ashamed. I am thoroughly ashamed. I am very very ashamed. So ashamed that the word ashamed have reached a new level, its called appalled or maybe even dismayed. Let's go with embarrassed. Yes, I am embarrassed.

Not merely because of the fact that 5,000 angst up Malay students from UiTM decided to go to the streets to protest against a single suggestion, yes I repeat, a SUGGESTION. But also because of the fact that, now, other branches of the same institution are trying to outdo each other by protesting on the same thing, a SUGGESTION.

Yesterday, my wife suggested that we eat chicken for dinner. Considering that she's pregnant and did not have the energy to cook (and I can't cook delicious food), I said to her, no. Owh yes, very civil indeed. I refuted her suggestion and said, cook egg instead. Its easier. I didn't feel like eating chicken because it will only cause hardship to her. We discussed on it a little bit. But, I certainly didn't feel like walking on the street with banners and posters or you know giving a memorandum to my wife's father because I did not want to take up her suggestion. I think I did well just by saying, no.

Why all these defensiveness? Why the sudden need to tell the world that UiTM is the sanctity of Malay education? We know it is meant for the Malays. Why all these angst up aggression in wanting to defend your right? You are definitely not going to make it easier for you guys when you go out. Do you think the world out there consist of Malay? With only Malays as your future employer, and only Malays are going to generate your income?

I've got news for you. We are multi racial. Most companies out there, or institution or whatever future employers that might interest you, are not just Malays. When you step out of the University, you are going to compete with non-Malays. When you do that, and when you go for interviews in a dominantly non-Malay organization (which are a lot nowadays), do you think you hold the upper hand just because you are Malay? That's competition for you in a multi racial society. Live with it.

If you are so set on competing only among yourself, then set on limiting your chances. When I went for an interview with the place I work in now, I had to compete with 2 other non-Malays. When I went for the second interview, there were 3 and I was the only Malay. Was I intimidated? Nope. I didn't see the difference in the race or the color. I only saw the difference in ability. I know I wasn't the best among the interviewees, but at least I know I can compete because I was in that environment since primary school up till my University days.

According to Khaled Nordin, the Higher Education Minister, the suggestion from the Selangor MB to open the university on the basis of 'competition' is not warranted because the Malays are able to compete with themselves. Then he said, the Selangor MB is insulting the Malays. Are you sure? He is impliedly saying that the Malays can only compete with ourselves and why must we compete with the non-Malays. I think he is the one who is insulting the Malays. By saying that the Malays can compete with themselves, that's not only limiting our competing ability, but that's also shunning the real world from the Malays. You have to compete with others!

My friend in his blog (http://sangpenchenta.blogs.friendster.com) said this :
"Masa Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awan (JPA) ubah kuota biasiswa dari ratio 90:10 (bumiputera: bukan bumiputera) kepada 55:45, ada orang Melayu melalak? Ada Ibrahim Abu Shah menyalak? Budak-budak UiTM yang konon bela Melayu sangat ni, benteng terakhir Melayu kononnya, ada berarak pergi Putrajaya? Takde. Malah dengan bangganya Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Dato' Seri Nazri Aziz mempertahankan keputusan JPA tu kerana ratio tu mewakili pecahan kaum & seimbang...MRSM yang ditubuhkan untuk bela Melayu jugak menerima pelajar bukan bumiputera, kuota 10% jugak, dah lama dah implement, ada sesiapa menyalak? Takde pun. Malah, jawapan Timbalan Menteri Pelajaran baru-baru ni, bila ditanya nisbah pelajar bumiputera: bukan bumiputera di MRSM, rationya bukan lagi 90:10 tapi 87:13, ada Melayu yang menyalak & berarak?"

This makes a whole lot of sense. It is the same "MARA" and the same government institution, the same action and yet the outcome is different. Why is that? Why not defend the the Malays from the grassroot level (in this case - the schoolers). Why only the University? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the University is the next step to the real world. The real world consists of not only Malays, but also non-Malays. And therefore the ideal preparation is, competition with the real people.

In my previous entry, I tried hard to defend the Malays. I tried hard to find a compromise and save the little dignity the Malay UiTM students have. But now, I can't find it in me to defend anymore. Their act is just blown out of proportion. The mere suggestion which was made not in a political context by the MB has now been politicized by the UMNO. I'm saddened by this. The students take the bait. I myself am a true believer in having a quality education and wanting the same to carry my race forward. But with narrow minded people, I don't how we're going to achieve that.

My only advice is, look at the world out there. Look where you are. Look who is at the top and who is at the bottom. I'm sure some non-Malays have looked into this issue with keen interest and am sure they etched it in their hearts the conduct of the Malay UiTM students and are keen to know your stand when you step out of the University. Do you really want to be in the losing end of the war? Yes you may win the battle of securing UiTM's status, but when you go out looking for a job, do you think you have won the war? Don't be stupid.

Protesting over a mere suggestion shows your brash, arrogant and stupid attitude. If you really are student of higher education, look up diplomacy in the dictionary (its probably in the library, you know the building with a lot of books in it). While you're at it, look up the word suggestion and google on how to refute it. You do know what Google is right?

Peace :)

A Letter to my Unborn Child

Dear child,

Your mom and dad are working hard to nurture you into this world. Your mom in particular is struggling everyday, fighting to survive this journey which would bring you and this world together at last. Be grateful to your mom because she has been held against the rope so many times and is still able to come out with her head held up high. No one, and trust me, no one could love you more than she does. Love her as much as she loves you...

Every moment since this journey began is a struggle. A fight between life and death. Life being the ultimate success and death being the biggest obstacle for either one of us. However, both must be accepted in earnest because we realise that the journey must one day end.

Do not be disappointed by what you see in this world. What you see is what this world gives. Instead, be thankful. Be thankful that your mom has the will to fight for you. Be thankful that others have a fought a cause to better your future. Be thankful that your fight would be the fight that was left by warriors. Continue this fight.

Remember Allah my child. Struggle for His cause. Remember His words and remember His Syari'e. Never abandon your religion and never abandon your faith. Understand that this world might one day condemn your very belief and it is you who must stand with your belief to fight the evil that denies it.
Remember these words in Surah Luqman (31:7-8)

[7] When Our Signs are rehearsed to such a one, he turns away in arrogance, as if he heard them not, as if there were deafness in both his ears: announce to him a grievous Penalty. [8] For those who believe and work righteous deeds, there will be Gardens of Bliss

Your road is yours to pave, your life is yours to lead, your faith is yours to hold and your struggle is yours to fight. Love the life you are given so battle for the life you love...

With love,
Dad

Giving ACA the benefit of the doubt

The ACA is really going all out huh? I hear from certain people who heard this from the people in ACA themselves that they are going out guns blazing. Though I'm pretty skeptical about the whole thing as, you know, the agency is still within the purview of the Government's control. But if they are really sincere in bringing reform and getting rid of those bad apples within the nation's administrative body, then I hope they bring forth that sincerity with the proper actions.

I remember in 2004-2005 after BN won that election, Badawi said that he'd go all out to eradicate corruption and thus lots of cases (as it is now) were highlighted in the media. Now don't get me wrong, it is good that some people are caught (at least some are), but still, if they don't go all out then how can we eradicate?

Then again, what happened after that? No news of any ACA movements and actions worth mentioning...until now.

We're hearing about that Tourism fellow being charged and also other cases like they are allegedly investigating the report made against the PM and DPM - most likely would come to nothing. The Terengganu cases are also being investigated and so is the AG and IGP. To date, the investigation is not as transparent as I would like but I still have hope. Sufficed to say, we the people must never forget all these 'investigations' because the moment we forget, the matter would definitely not be settled.

Take for example the Nurin Jazlin episode which until now nothing has surfaced. The Sharlinie case which would most probably die out (as it is dying out at the moment). The Lingam clip is just another plain example of how something big can turn to dust (aren't we supposed to get an update on this case?). The claims against the DPM have always turned to nothing and he walks away Scot free as if his history is as pure as a newborn baby.

So remember people, remember not to forget. Remember to stay alert. Yes we are being burdened by so many questions that need serious answers and we tend to forget. But don't. Try not to forget. Question these things all the time. Question it each month if you must. Make a diary of all that's happening and raise your voice if there are no answers. Someone must be accountable for all these ruckus and we must demand the answer.

Peace :)

The Malay Situation

Recent events surrounding the position of Malay and the notion of Malay supremacy has again resurfaced after many months of solitude (from that particular issue) since the 8th of March. No I'm not referring to the forum issue, though I must say, please don't relate the forum issue with Malay, because from what I heard and came to know, there are also Indian and Chinese converts in the protestor's side. Malay issue has been brought up again regarding the suggestion given by Selangor MB on the quota of UiTM.

UiTM, as some would view it, is a sanctity for Malay education. This is where the Malays would be guaranteed higher education. This is where those Malays, some not at all, who can't afford higher education at some posh university or college or who just lack the proper merit to enter other institutions would be given the opportunity. This is the very institution where the Malays (again- some, not all) would feel that their right and privilege is still intact.

The Selangor MB suggested that 10% quota be given to the non-Malays. What a brave suggestion. But where does it stand in terms of Malay acceptance? Not so well. I'm sure some people view it as the PKR people trying to win over the non-Malays again and again. To this I say, does PKR really need to do that? The non-Malays already hate the hell out of UMNO so the alternative would be PKR. Now, they don't need to try and win them over. Knowing the MB (as I do personally - but its been quite some time) his intention is good. But, I reserve his suggestion only to a certain extent.

Not that I'm against it totally. But we must consider the circumstances and the condition of our nation. Yes, we are a multi-ethnic nation that is most unique - Malaysia is truly Asia. So whatever we do must have a certain compromise. For example, Bar Council shouldn't have held that forum as it lights the sensitive side of Muslim. They could however do it in a different manner, different time and different forum all together. But since this is not what this entry is about, I won't need to go much deeper.

If we want to give a portion of the 'Malay rights' (I can't find any other way to put this), then we must always remember to balance it out. You see, UiTM is the core institution for Malays to get higher education. Without it, those who can't afford lavish private Universities or attain enough merit to enter top ranking Universities cannot get higher education. Its as simple as that.

If we look at the societal aspect of it, Malays are down trodden. We are easily the poorest economically, we are the source of our own problem (UMNO and corruption) and we are also the majority of the population. Because this is the case, many Malays fail to get the best of our own privilege and rights. I myself do not believe in the need for Malay privilege, not after 50 years of Merdeka. Its been too long and we should've been able to carry ourself forward by now. It is therefore a source of our own problem. But, be that as it is, UiTM is still the only way out for most (and I say most because there are a lot of poor Malays out there) aspiring student to get higher education at the top level.

I myself am not a UiTM student and I, frankly speaking, am not fond of UiTM. Not because its not a good University or that I'm anti-Malay (ridiculous), but it's because I am not fond of how the Malays become in such lack Islamic environment (sorry, but that is my view, may offend some, and if it does then look yourself in the mirror).

However I still believe that UiTM does in a way protect my own race and gives it that opportunity to succeed and that part of UiTM I am fond of. In any case, I think there may still be a compromise. Here are some of my suggestions:

• As most of the Malays cannot afford private colleges that provides the best academicians and facilities like Sunway College, Help College, INTI college, etc., the government should therefore sponsor more Malays for higher education in those private colleges. If 10% quota can be given to non-Malays in UiTM then Malays should be given the proper support on the other side as well.
• 10% quota can still be given but the amount of Malays in UiTM should be maintained. Meaning the 10% quota is only a rise from the current number of students. Thus, if say right now we have 10000 Malay student in UiTM, then raise the total number of students to 11000 and give the added 1000 to non-Malays. The right of Malay would not be infringed.
• The government should subsidize a significant amount of the fee for poor Malay students who would like to enter private colleges and also give sponsorship for their basic needs like textbook and other equipments. This is quite a lot to ask from the government, but it is better then sponsoring no good, unappreciative students who study oversea and doesn't want to return.
• The government should provide more Universities for Malay students which also gives the right amount of number for non-Malays. Therefore it would balance out the lost by the Malays in giving 10% space to non-Malays in UiTM.

I'm sure a compromise could be achieved if the right people implement the right policies and the right people explains the mechanism of those policies. I believe in the right of all people. I know there are also poor Chinese and poor Indians who would like as much a chance to advance their education. So no right should be left idle.

I am not against the suggestion totally, especially if they can set out the best solution for the betterment of all people without taking away the rights of some others - which in this case is the Malays'. But I am against those who totally reject the idea based on their alpha Malay notion and not hearing out on the concept and total idea behind it. If a compromise could be reached to facilitate all the races, then why not? After all, it could only make Malaysia stronger and better.

Peace :)

The Olympics...Malaysia boleh!

"But if you use all the facilities on offer and have the determination you would be stupid not to improve." - Manuel Almunia

I came across this statement made by Manuel Almunia, the Arsenal keeper (Go Arsenal!!), when he was talking about Theo Walcott. He was merely saying that Walcott should be tougher on the pitch even though he is a "lovely guy" off it. Before that Almunia was saying about how he is from a small club and kept on being determined to be Arsenal's no.1 and had to endure seasons of being second to Lehmann. Alas, he is no.1.

Now Malaysia is in a similar vein. We can be considered as 'coming from a small club' and we are second to most of the Asian countries (even in ASEAN!). But Almunia was able to push through and went up the ranks to be one of the world's biggest and most talented club's no.1 keeper. How come Malaysia seems a long way to the top still, after 50 years?

If we want to give examples, there would be plenty. Ronaldinho had nothing growing, so did Thierry Henry, the Toure brothers, I'm sure those skinny runners from Ghana had nothing and also so many other sportsmen.

However, based on my own experience and my own view, it would seems that our sportsmen are not from this background. They had it all when they were little. Malaysia may not be that advanced in terms of technology, but surely more advanced than Ghana (skinny runners), or war torn Ivory Coast (Toure brothers). Why do we lack the sporting skills? Our facilities are one of the best in Asia. Our athletes are as built as athletes in Thailand or Korea. But we still lag behind.

Korea already won a gold for swimming competition against all odds. They went up against Australia and the US, the 2 power houses of swimming competitions. China is making headway in the Olympics, but of course being the host nation (and the nation that houses billions of people!), they are always going to be one of those at the top.

I know this may seem like a sports entry, but (to relate to the real issue) I still think that the lack of enthusiasm and ability from our athletes stems from the nation's philosophy on everything...take things for granted.

Yes we have the resources, the manpower, the technology, the brains, the wits, the promise, the vision, the leaders, the all and all richness. But nothing comes out of it. Singapore only has a tiny island (and now a tinier island - thanks to En. Gani) and yet they are richer than us. Thailand is worst than us in terms of its politics, but the people there seems to be able to play football with a better tactical understanding. The Korean seems to be protesting on every issue possible known to man, but still their politicians are able to be accountable. The Japanese have such small eyes and yet our people seems to drool over their ladies (and man). Why?

Our attitude is that we have it all, why care? We have rich oil fields and are only one the few countries in the world that has that luxury; but we waste it. Our nation's people are not given the full benefit of it and in turn are impoverished. We have water and sand, and yet we sell it to Singapore at basement price - then buy it back expensively!. We have diverse races and yet they are not utilized accordingly. I mean, we all know Malays are artsy, Chinese are smart, Indians are hardworking and so on...But where do we waste these manpower?

Had the government focused on efforts to consolidate the resources with better guidance and policies I'm sure our nation wouldn't be as troubled as we are now. In turn, our athletes wouldn't become under achievers for so many years gone by. I mean, right now we are hoping for our first gold medal, and it would most likely come from Chong Wei, but my question is, how come we have not won a gold medal for badminton after years of being an excellent badminton team and producing world class badminton players?

Now the government's plan is to give the athletes money amounting to RM1 million. Is that the key to our success? Giving money would help I'm sure as it would increase determination. But that's not the answer. What we need is better education. Kids who grow up knowing themselves to be athletes are just too cocky (sorry to say - may offend some). They know they are good at sports and they do not feel the need to raise the bar. I know this because I have many friends in that mould. What they really need is self belief as well modesty. Just like what our nation needs.

When we have self belief and modesty, that's the perfect balance for the richness that we are blessed with. We do believe in our ability and yet we don't need be so arrogant so as to flaunt it. Again back to Almunia's statement "But if you use all the facilities on offer and have the determination you would be stupid not to improve".

That is what we are at the moment. Not to say stupid, but lack the mental understanding and maturity to accept that we are a great nation and we should live up to that expectation. But, we have got to understand that we can't live up to that expectation just by walking onto the grass, we must work hard and utilize our resources. That is where being humble and modest is important. We need to feel the need to work in hopes of improving. I still have high hopes for Malaysia, in all aspects.

Peace :)

The Forum As Expected

Reader's discretion advised: I'm aware that touching on the forum issue would in one way or another pour scorn upon my view and writing, but I feel that the issue is one that I need to touch upon and express. Some may like it and some may not, to read is at your own will.

The forum went as expected and also as expected, prematurely ended. To whose fault is this? To who should we put the blame? Who had the last laugh? Was it anyone's right to address or protest? These are some of the questions that went through my mind when I came to know about the forum and what eventually happened as a result. Now, I'm not a person who is narrow minded and rigid, nor am I insensitive and intolerant. I'd like to believe that I am rational.

The forum was and as have been well established, one that is sensitive, touching upon sensitive issues and sensitive people and sensitive in every way and every manner one could ever imagine sensitive to be. Why? Because it touches upon religious issues. In this country where race and religion is diverse and the people are well aware of each other's standing, any talk of such nature would inevitably cause a volcano effect - regardless of whoever is the initiator and whoever is the subject-link.

Am I disappointed? Yes, indeed I am. Why? Because those Bar people have been warned. Those Bar people have been made known of the undesired effect of holding such a talk. It is not political in any ways, even if some journalist and writers would like to put it that way - it is not. But when a leader from UMNO and a leader from PKR agrees on a certain point, then don't disagree. It is that sensitive. Why not listen?

Yes I know everyone has a voice. Everyone has the right to be heard. But other people also have their rights. When you exercise your right that means you are stepping on other people's right. E.g. when you extend your hand in a crowded small room, the person next to you have to fold theirs. This is the effect and this will always be the effect.

When you talk about your right to be heard, as oppose to another 15 million other people's right to shout, the mathematics could only sum up the obvious.

Now what was there to talk about? The issue is of course, legal in nature. But is it totally legalistic in its substance? It is not. I'm not denying the fact that some might have the right to question other people's right (e.g. section 121A), but is it fair? Is it fair that some have been accommodated to a large extent, more than just a breathing space - with for example the civil court. To then question the right of another only because a smidgen of 'self believe' have not been given grounds to walk on is not fair.

I am talking in code yes? Indeed I am. Let me explain.

The Muslims' breathing ground have always been the Syari'ah. The code of Law in accordance with Islamic scriptures. We have been given this right only supplementary to the civil right, hence s.121A of the Federal Constitution. The insertion of 'A' into s.121 denotes a sense of accompanying effect into the 'right' itself. But does it bother the Muslims? It does not. We do not have our own Syari'ah Bar council, like the civil Bar. Does the Muslim question that fact? No (not out loud). But why is it that when Bar council decide to hold a forum on a religious issue, focusing on Islam, the Muslims protest? Because that is where Bar has stepped over the thin line.

It is not that this Muslims aren't educated and are just plain stupid. It is far from that. They are felt by the most sensitive issue ever to touch them. Is it because they do not understand the forum itself? I don't think so. Some might argue this point to a large extent but to me it is not because of what the forum aims to achieve, but it's what the forum fail to understand. Religious fundamentals are not issues for discussion without proper guidelines. Yes Bar may argue that there are guidelines and what not. But who to guide? Are we banked upon believing that a mere presence of a Syari'e lawyer would digress the matter out of its core perception?

I do understand and regret that some protestors did cross the line with certain unruly behavior, but so has Bar council with its own unnecessary forum, when they rightly know the effect. What does the forum aim to achieve? I understand 'rights' issues are thrown into the fray, but the matter is still a religious one. Don't say they have not been warned.

I am disappointed that some people seems to think that the actions by some of the protestors are terrorist-like. What terrorist-like? Are people terrorized? Let's put this into perspective; When it is a Muslim activist, it is terrorism. George Bush claims himself to be a religious man, he bombs Iraq and Afghan and helps Israel in manhandling the powerless Palestinian, why is he not a terrorist? Merely shouting derogatory remarks does not make a person a terrorist. We have people in France, England and Korea burning flags and terrorizing streets but no one seems to call them terrorist.

The forum's issue should be addressed; Yes, but by Muslims. Only Muslim can best explain the issue. If non-Muslims are interested then lend their ears. If non-Muslims wants to paint their view, then let them be heard. I'm sure this can be compromised. I fail to accept that if Muslims were to talk about non-Muslims religious fundamentals the non-Muslims won't react. It is absurd to think so, because it is the same everywhere and to whomsoever. Would there come a time when people would look past everything and focus on the issue? I'm afraid, not.

People seem to think that we have reached a point where we are so well educated and well informed and so very well developed that our thinking are so matured in every means possible. That can never be true. Aren't we the ones that say the Romans during the olden days are advanced during their time; still they had religious wars. We are also the ones that admitted that the Pharaoh was advanced in its days, but the Pharaoh died carelessly because of its obsession with religion. Aren't we the ones that said the Arabs were advanced during the time the west were a mess; still there were religious wars. People can never be too advanced. Religion is not merely about the advancement of the intellect but it is also the fulfillment of the spiritual health. That is why religion is always going to be sensitive.

Peace :)

The Critics That Were Once Just That

Is the title confusing? I don't know...Looks confusing.

So anyway...These 'critics' I'm mentioning is Dr.M and also the great Chandra Muzaffar! (I don't know why, but his name just seems to draw such a powerful introduction - CHANDRA! hee...) So what's with these 2 old news? Well, they have been neglected for quite awhile and are now trying to pry their way to make a comeback with rhetorical messages and comments. Are they irrelevant nowadays? Indeed they are. Are they influential? To quite an extent the first one is, but I don't know about the second one.

Let's start with the Great Dr.M! (nope not so much of the majesticness of the CHANDRA!) He said something (which I just read) about the silent majority in the country needs to speak up. I don't know what he's talking about really. What silent majority? Is he talking about UMNO or the nation itself? Cos last time I check, the opposition won 5 states and took Kuala Lumpur. If that's not speaking up then I don't know what is.

He spoke about leaders, great leaders and how the current leaders are not up to the standard that is required of the great nation that is Malaysia. That part I agree. To this he said, "Could it be that our leaders lack honour and the sense to accept responsibility and to retire gracefully? Some simply cannot accept the realities, the role they had played in the destruction of a near-perfect system which had done so much for our country..." Well true, the current leaders must learn to stand down as did Mahathir - only to reiterate his stance (after Rafidah came crying) and retire at a later time. Okay we forgive you that time.

But hey, aren't you retired? Being retired doesn't that mean you should've backed off and not take part in the administration? How can he use the word "retire gracefully" without feeling the pinch? Amazing...

Owh and he also said, "Could it be that we forgot to teach this generation of leaders about the sacrifices made by our founding fathers. Could it be that we cannot handle wealth as we did poverty?" If anyone did 'forget' then its you. You failed at that. These are all your people. Its not like they are 5 year old when you were the PM. Forget sacrifice? Isn't he the one that totally disrespected the father of independence Tunku Abdul Rahman and asked (in fact forced) the Tunku to retire? We cannot handle wealth as we did poverty? Where are our wealth? Putrajaya? KLCC? Or is it with the people? Yes we fail to handle wealth cos you failed. Owh by the way, his talking about 'Malaysians' now instead of 'Malay'...Haih.

Okay, getting to emotional with the great Dr. M...Let's move on to CHANDRA!

CHANDRA! (sorry can't help it), is as many know, the former PKR member who fought bravely alongside Anwar during the Reformasi days of sodomy the first. He then left, and continued badgering Anwar on how Anwar is forgetting his roots and what not. I don't wanna touch on that issue but rather I would like to comment on his recent effort to make himself known...again.

He says that Anwar's claim that he can get at least 30 MPs to cross over is undemocratic. To this I have this to say; What is undemocratic is our system. Where UMNO members cannot elect a President. When the President so easily pass the baton to his VP. Where an MP of the government cannot go against the party line or he shall be scorn by the party's chief whip. Where party member must get the required amount of nomination to contest for top posts. Where the people cannot choose their PM but rather it is the party that does. If we want to consider democracy, the recent survey which shows that only 40% of the people approves the PM and only 35% approves the DPM means that they are not the choice of the people. If it were up to democracy, they would not be the PM and DPM!

Now Anwar's claim may not be up to the standard of pure democracy, but it is line with the democratic system that appears pure. It is the democracy that people should have a choice, whether it be MPs jumping on the other side or an MP calling an end to her MP-hood. Democracy is about the people's choice. If Wan Azizah retreat from being an MP, and the people doesn't like it, it is not like they are not given the mandate to express their disappointment. They can vote. That is more democratic then passing the baton as if that post is made for you and your people (it is the Premier position of the nation after all!)

So if MP wants to jump, it is democracy. If people don't like it, then according to the letters of the law, then can vote against it in the next election. People are still given the mandate. I for one likes democracy to be pure, but, ain't gonna happen. But as long as people's choice are not taken away from them, I would say, that is almost the best damn thing I can hope for.

Peace :)

I want Saiful to come out!

The sodomy allegation against Anwar has reached new heights. No one would have thought that the bail would be granted to Anwar. No one would even dare think that the charge against Anwar would state that the complainant himself is part of the crime...and I was there to see it.

I'm a law graduate and part of the law society. I go to court I would say about once a week at least. I don't really like working in the legal arena where the rich and powerful would prosper against the weak and poor. The eloquent would defeat the brain. But today, I enjoyed going to court. Because I can say, I was there when it happened.

Anwar was charged in the same court in which my organization was supposed to have a case (but was postponed for obvious reasons). We were half way to the court when we got a call to say that our case is postponed. But my senior colleague nonetheless decided to go ahead anyway and set a date with the judge. It just so happened, the case was in the same court as where Anwar is to be charged. Lucky me.

As I reached the front of the court room, a swarm of photographers were waiting for the man himself. Entering the court room had never been so overwhelming. Photographers were taking pictures, regardless of whoever was entering the court room.

Okay, no more talk about my experience which has nothing to do with the case.

When Anwar entered the court room with his usual entourage and fellow fighters (the likes of Guan Eng, Kit Siang, Wan Azizah, Nurul Izzah) you cannot help appreciate the true nature of the moment - it was special. You knew this man, smiling and eyes sparkling, had a mission to go a few steps further to reach his calling. When talking to one Indian lady in the court room, I could hear him saying to her, "this is the last step". Indeed it could be.

It is the last step for Anwar towards achieving his goal. Perhaps some might say that his last goal is to be the PM, but to me, its more than that. He wants freedom, he fights for the people and he claims to be the champion of the nation. A claim which I would laud for at any given time, because we have been lacking a hero lately- in the true sense of word.

Now several matters attracted me during the proceeding.

First of all, the charge itself. It is a charge under s.377B of the Penal Code. Which states that the sexual act against the order of nature (which could mean anything from sodomy to blow jobs) to be one that is consensual. What intrigues me is this - Hamid Albar said that Saiful must not be charged because he is the complainant. Now what is there to complaint? When it is consensual in nature it is not considered a 'complainant' but rather a confessor. Meaning he confessed to committing the act. He must therefore be charged. I give you a situation; say Mr. S assisted in the murder of someone and went to the police and say I helped killed Mr. N (be imaginative and use the initials given to good use). Now the police investigates and indeed found the confession to be true. Wouldn't Mr. S be liable to a court proceeding?

Now the second matter is concerning the S-G himself. The S-G from the many stories I heard and the many descriptions given to me, is a very very soft hearted and good man. This is a claim which I deem to be true. I am surprised that he is in charge for this case by the way. So anyway, when the charge was read and the S-G was asked regarding the bail matter, he didn't look quite confident - as though reluctant. This is only my view of the matter. When asked whether he thinks that Anwar might abscond, he looked unsettled and said "there is always a possibility". But that's all he said. Sulaiman, counsel for Anwar picked this is up and used it to good use to draw the attention of the judge towards the uncertainty of the S-G himself.

The third matter is, the question by the judge towards the Investigating Officer (DSP Pereira) and the IO's response. The judge asked, as have always been the question in all bail hearing, whether or not Anwar have been cooperative with the police. The IO simply answered "yes". This is different from what have always been said by the other superior policeman. They have always said Anwar is not cooperative, he is avoiding this, avoiding that. But the IO made no hesitation in answering "yes". Now the politicians on the other side have been recorded as saying, Anwar is reluctant to cooperate, maybe he is guilty. Similarly that is the case with young Saiful - but not the IO. That is quite a justification of the current situation. Congratulations Mr. Pereira.

Now with all these clouds hanging above the case and the charge. I wonder what Saiful have got to say. He has always been saying, Anwar needs to be brought to justice. Anwar must swear on the Quran as he forced me to commit the act. Anwar this, Anwar that. Now the prosecution finds you to be part of the act. Do you want justice when you yourself is part of the charge? Why do you need justice when you are consensually committing the act? What kind of justice is that? Do you want to blame the prosecution now? How about withdrawing everything? That's an option. Owh and stop saying things from behind a veil. You said Anwar is a coward and he should stand up and be counted and all when you yourself is nowhere in sight. Now that's just cowardly. Owh and you said you wanna swear on the Quran after Anwar is charged, now swear fairly okay. You are deemed at the moment on trial of perception to have committed the act consensually. Better pray that Anwar is not acquitted for you yourself to be acquitted in the trial of public perception. I pass it over to you Saiful.

Peace :)

What happens if he becomes the PM?

What would happen? Consider the circumstances. The Permatang Pauh by-election is surely his to win. The people of Permatang Pauh would definitely feel hard done by, to see one of their own being humiliated and brought to unjustifiable justice. He has the confidence of Christiano Ronaldo in being able to attract MPs from the other side to join his quest. He still believes and truly believes at that, he will become the PM on 16th September 2008. Will he be? What if he does become just that?

The sodomy allegation, and by tomorrow - a trial, is just the kind of act you would expect from the powers that be. Rash, miscalculated and a flip flop of unsettled policy and direction. With all the drama that had led to the second sodomy allegation, all the counter arguments, all the surrounding circumstances, not to forget the leaked document and information, is it wise to proceed with the case?

The case might go on for quite some time. The Altantuya case has been going on for ages, mostly to cover certain unwanted allegations - which might well be true, only Allah knows. How would this trial go by? There will be a bail hearing, to decide whether or not he is able to get bail. He is after all a candidate for election. Even though the offence is usually granted bail, don't expect the same treatment for this man - he is after all, like Osama to US in Malaysian government context.

After that, certain cover ups need to be done to certain evidence which could tilt the trial one side - towards the accused. Then, there would be intervention from certain renowned figures wanting justice which would only mean, justice in the evil sense of word.

Then, the trial goes to defence stage and the defence put forth their case with such vigor and prowess that the prosecution, in normal circumstances, would have conceded defeat. But no, not this prosecution. They are backed by the most powerful people in the nation. Surely their resource cannot be defeated. Loopholes in the case as big as the moon are covered up by a tiny wet blanket, and the decision would still be against the accused.

But, oh wait, breaking news - Sarawak MPs and Sabah MPs decide to jump ship. The accused standing in trial has been endorsed by the coalition party PR as their President and with enough law makers on their side, he becomes the PM. How would that go about? The PM stands in trial, looking as jolly as ever. The judge, presiding over a case with the title Public Prosecutor v. Prime Minister...

This is a snippet of my imaginary trial...

Judge: Err, Mr. PM, how are you today?

PM: You've never asked me that question before? The trial has been going on for 2 months...Are you okay?

Judge: No, its nothing. Shall we proceed with the case? Prosecution are you prepared?

Prosecution: Wait, let me check with my case...Yea, let's proceed, if you don't mind of course Mr. PM.

PM: Oh sure, I've only got a country to run anyway. Why don't we just proceed.

Defence counsel: Your honor, we would like to call Mr. S to the stand.

Judge: Is that okay with you Mr. PM?

PM: Proceed...

(Mr. S is brought to the stand)

Prosecutor: You know what Yang Arif, forget it. Me and my assistant here have checked the file and err...and uh we don't think we have enough evidence here to do anything really. I mean, the kid's butt hole is as big as it was when he was a drop out. There's no bleeding or anything. Even my niece can see that his butt hole is normal.

Judge: Are you sure prosecutor? Do you know you just wasted 2 months of the court's time?

Prosecutor: Yeah, I'm sure. I mean, we're on a contract and err, the PM needs to be in the office to sign those contracts. Let's not waste time trying a case that's you know, childish. I mean this kid (pointing at Mr. S) is just a brat. He's nothing. I'll charge him for something else later.

Judge: Okay then. Its decided then, this case has no merit and would be thrown out.

PM: Praise be to Allah, justice have been done. Now I want to sit in my office, run the country, probably terminate a couple of contracts and uh, charge several public figures. Let's see how it goes.

-End-

Peace :)

The perception

I recently had lunch with one of my colleague, a Malay and supporter of PAS. I had a chat with him, as usual, with regards to current political situations. Usually when we have this kind of talk, my opinion would be more open but with a notion of Islamic substance (because I'd like to think that that's how my perception of politic should be conveyed). His opinion would be more staunchly, PAS.

I have nothing against this. Some people are like that. Don't get me wrong, I support PAS' Islamic concept and Islamic vision for the nation. I find nothing wrong with that. I do believe that if the non-Muslim actually understands the full concept of all the fundamental principle of PAS' agenda then there should be no dispute. If I as a Muslim can live in country where civil procedure (English in nature) and democratic policy (French in origin) is incorporated without having to demonstrate everyday, then why can't Islamic principles be applied? After all, I don't see that many French and English people roaming the streets. Muslim, yes there are plenty.

So anyway, as a result of our conversation on why PAS' Islamic concept cannot be accepted and why DAP strongly disagrees to many of PAS' actions, i suggested that the parties create a sort of exchange program. This would mean, the component parties of the Pakatan Rakyat accept each other's members, e.g. a member from PAS to DAP, a member of DAP to PAS, to PKR or PKR to PAS or....you get the point. Like an exchange student program. This would definitely instill a sort of education among party members and enhance the learning curve needed to consolidate the coalition.

To my suggestion, my colleague had this to say, I would accept DAP to PAS, but not PAS to DAP. My reply was....Haih.

Do you not understand the concept of trade for success? If we say it is not doable then that's wrong. It is totally doable. In fact, to my suggestion is easier then the one practised by Rasulullah s.a.w. during the early inception of Islam to the world because, what I suggested is a two way program. During Rasulullah's time, after a certain treaty (can't remember the name, I think it was Hudaibiah), the agreement was that the Muslims (already living in Madinah) had to return some of their own Quraishy to Makkah without the Muslims receiving any back (meaning the Muslimswho migrated to Madinah had return some of their people to Makkah without the Makkan kafir diong the same). Rasulullah endorsed this agreement because, he knew the benefits of it.

What is the benefit? The Muslim from Madinah can go back to Makkah and teach those kafir in Makkah. So it has been practised before and that is what I am suggesting. I'm not asking for party members to convert or anything, after all DAP is a multi-racial party. I'm just proposing an educational exchange.

This is not only a problem with PAS' supporter. I for a fact know that some non-Muslim are also prejudicial towards certain Muslim people and especially to PAS itself. I do not think that Malaysia can have a stable government because of the fact that there are too many different ideas and agendas moving around that no unity can ever be achieved. Right now unification for hatred is the highest order. The target is UMNO. But after that? That is why I must again say, education is important. We must not be single minded and prejudicial. Listen and understand first. Franklin Roosevelt said education is important in democracy and I verily agree.

Peace :)

Integrity

I recently went for the Integrity course at my workplace and it was conducted by a very renowned scholar Prof Muhammad Uthman Al-Muhammady of the Malaysian Institute of Integrity. Very humble and wise man indeed. If my life is like Star Wars, he is definitely Yoda. I mean this in a very good way.

In talking about integrity, he inserts many Islamic fundamentals and Islamic principle. I sense that some people in that room wasn't very comfortable with this. My sense was justified when, right after I came out of the room, my colleague stated this fact to me. She's not againts what the speaker was saying, but rather the fact that the talk revolved around Islamic teachings whilst the talk should be in general form. She said, she agreed to what was said but probably felt marginalised in the sense that, mentioning integrity in its Islamic form does not live to its title of "Integrityand Ethics". It should be, according to her, "Integrity and Ethics according to Islamic Perspective".

Yes, there may be a confusion in terms of the title and the talk itself, but I said to her that she should look beyond the word Islam to grasp the true message of the talk itself. After consulting another non-Muslim on this matter, I discovered that the non-Muslims were rather more reserved on this matter as the word "Islam" seems to instill a certain negativity towards the whole issue. It's not Islam itself, but rather their acceptance of wanting to hear things in a secular manner, meaning no mentioning of religion.

I know for a fact that they do accept the message. I know for a fact that Islam itself is respected. I know for a fact that the contents of the talk is undoubted. But they do not want quotation of sources to be from "Allah" or "Islam". They want it to be clearly seperated.

I can understand their sentiment. But what I believe is this, I myself do not discriminate. I myself accept. I can say that I am a practising Muslim and I respect people of other religion and ethnicity. The fact that the Ustaz quoted the Quran and praised Allah is not something that non-Muslims should be offended by. If one writes a thesis, or a book, and that person refers to another source, that person must quote and cite the other person so as not to copy blindly other people's idea. Same here. He quoted the Quran to name his source. He mentioned Allah because he quoted Allah. He praised Allah because that is his belief. Why must we shy away from our belief?

During my studies, my favourite subject is Jurisprudence. To learn principle and theories of morality and ethics and so many other things from different perspectives really opened my eyes to differing realms of thinking. So from that sense I can appreciate these people's sentiment. But then again, if I can learn and study other people's perspective which I do not agree, why can't others do the same?

The idea of a reform and thinking is the ability to accept the good and the bad and formulate one's own objectives from one's own perspective. I'm sure everyone believes in being good regardless or race and religion, so look beyond the word "Allah" and "Islam" then you would find the same underlying principle. But as a Muslim, I cannot look beyond Allah and Islam because the principle is not beyond It, but rather it is with It.

My colleague told me that she didn't believe in God itself. She disagreed with the point mentioned by the Ustaz that, we do good, because God wants us to do good. She said we do good because we want us to do good. To my believe both are true. One thing you need to know is that we are given a choice. Allah is fair. Fair does not necessarily mean that, one person is rich the others must be rich as well. Fair means all are given a choice. If you work hard to become rich, if God pleases, you will be rich. If you fail then do not worry because as long as you follow the right path you will be rewarded. If you become rich by unlawful means, then the punishment awaits in the hereafter. Similarly, either good or bad, your character depends on what you choose to become.

We do good because Allah wants us to do good. Just like we do good because our parents wants us to do good. Does any parents want their children to do bad? No. Whether or not we do good is still up to us. But if we do bad, be reminded that Allah wants us to do good. Our parents want us to do good. That is the message in doing good. I'm sure no one would oppose this concept so do not be offended just by the mention of the "Allah" or "Islam". The message is universal because Islam itself is universal.

Peace :)

Anwar dah Per"matang" Pauh

So the great one have announced his intention to take the seat he once held for oh so many years. It began in 1982 and ended in 1998. Wan Azizah took over in 1999 until last Thursday and now like in 1998, for a brief moment, the seat is vacant. That's the glory of politics.

In a sense, Anwar has indeed matured. He was one of the leader of a corrupt party, brought down in his prime. Now, after so many years of fighting the good fight, with the good people, he has risen to the fore and ready to lead again! Permatang Pauh is indeed the right place to begin his political comeback.

Haha okay the intro is boring me like hell!!

Now how did this Permatang Pauh thing came about? Well from my observation it is a smart and well calculated move. Hei, don't get me wrong, he would've taken any other seat had he contested in any of them. Pak Rembau was saying something like, "If dia betul berani, betul ramai sangat orang sokong dia, buktikan la. Jangan main seat mudah". Amboih pak Rembau, you're lucky your father-in-lwa is the PM. I betcha you won't even be in the Parliament if it had not been for him.

He said Kulim. Well for obvious reasons, it is hard for him to proceed with that seat. The court verdict is in the middle of August. The court might go any other way but it would still be too late. Anwar might be battling his own court case by then. So he wants the 60 days limit announced by the EC hastened a bit so that his road is clearer. He also said Bandar Tun Razak, but that's not where his heart lies. Kulim is close to Permatang Pauh so we can understand the sentiment.

To be honest, wherever he takes his battle it would be his hands down. No kidding. So lets just wait and see whether this ambitious and yet ill-fated politician can make a Ma Ying-jeou move (the Taiwanese President who became President even though he was involved in a broil with the corruption charges against him right before he announce his intentions to run in the 2008 presidential election).

Bring on Ezam, bring on tha guy that lost to Wan Azizah, bring whoever you want. I can assure from the ramblings I heard from the people of Permatang Pauh, it won't be an easy ride for the BN people. All I want to say is, the time has come for a massive change in Malaysian administration. Be it coming from the Pakatan or the BN, what we want is good governance, and that is best thing that can surface from all these political ramblings. May Allah bless us all!

Relevankah Demokrasi Dalam Sistem Berpartisan?

Demokrasi, walaupun ia dianggap sebagai sebuah sistem kerajaan yang kukuh, adil dan terbaik, ia bukanlah sebuah sistem yang sempurna. Memetik kata-kata Thomas Jefferson, Presiden Amerika yang ke-3, "Demokrasi hanyalah 'undang jenayah', di mana lima puluh satu peratus masyarakat mungkin mengambil hak empat puluh sembilan peratus yang lain".

Apa yang cuba disampaikan oleh beliau adalah; kemungkinan setiap anggota masyarakat atau parti atau mungkin juga sesebuah institusi itu untuk mendapat kepuasan sepenuhnya daripada keputusan pihak yang berkuasa dalam melakukan sesuatu tindakan tidak mungkin disenangi oleh setiap pihak.

Sistem demokrasi merupakan suatu sistem yang rapuh dan mudah dipengaruh oleh anasir-anasir luar, biar yang elok mahupun yang tidak elok. Ini kerana pemilihan seseorang itu sebagai pemerintah boleh disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor, samada pengaruhnya, kekayaannya, jasanya atau apa sahaja yang boleh membangkitkan namanya sebagai pilihan utama. Kehebatannya memimpin tidak semestinya faktor dorongan para pengundi.

Di beberapa negara, sistem demokrasi tidak begitu menyerlah kerana sistem itu dipengaruh oleh politik partisan . Politik partisan yang dimaksudkan di sini adalah kesetiaan seseorang individu itu supaya berpihak kepada partinya. Kesetiaan ini kadangkala bukanlah diterap atas dasar kemampuan parti itu atau keberkesanan ia dalam menyelesaikan masalah masyarakat, namun ia berdasarkan nama parti tersebut. Inilah yang menewaskan initipati sistem demokrasi itu sendiri.

Apakah salah seseorang itu bertindak menentang partinya sendiri jika itu yang dirasakan betul? Tidakkah seseorang pemimpin yang dipilih oleh segelintir masyarakat tempatan itu patut diberi kuasa untuk menyuarakan pandangan beliau yang juga pandangan masyarakat tempatan tersebut? Di dalam sebuah sistem demokrasi yang sebenarnya, ini tidak menjadi masalah.

Di Amerika misalnya, menyuarakan pendapat adalah dianggap biasa dan boleh dilakukan oleh mana-mana pihak tanpa mengira parti. Usul yang dicadangkan oleh pihak demokrat mungkin boleh diterima oleh pihak republikan dan juga sebaliknya.Di England, bekas Perdana Menteri Tony Blair yang menyokong perang ke atas Iraq telah ditentang oleh partinya sendiri namun disokong parti lawan. Walaupun negara-negara ini mempunyai kekurangan masing-masing, namun sistem demokrasi di negara-negara tersebut jelas nyata cuba diterapkan dengan sebaiknya.

Di dalam sistem demokrasi yang sebenarnya, seseorang pemimpin itu dipilih melalui undi majoriti masyarakat. Namun begitu ini tidak mungkin dicapai jika ada politik partisan. Di dalam sistem yang sedia, pemilihan yang dilakukan oleh rakyat hanya mampu memilih pemimpin disesuatu peringkat sahaja. Namun untuk memilih pemimpin tertinggi secara langsung tidak mungkin dapat dicapai atas pemilihan majoriti masyarakat.

Oleh itu, relevankah demokrasi?

Di dalam sistem yang sedia ada, seseorang itu mungkin tampil sebagai pemimpin tanpa diundi. Manakala, seseorang itu juga mungkin menjadi pemimpin kerana tidak ditentang oleh mana-mana pihak; bukan kerana tiada yang ingin bertanding, tetapi kerana tidak memenuhi quota yang ditetapkan oleh sistem. Biarpun si penentang itu mempunyai kredibiliti sebagai pemimpin namun sistem yang lemah menghadkan peluang beliau. Ini bukanlah demokrasi yang lengkap.

Di dalam Islam misalnya, walaupun ia tidak berteraskan demokrasi seperti yang diwar-warkan oleh orang Barat, namun intipatinya hampir sama. Khulafak Ar-Raasyidin telah dipilih berdasarkan undian ahli ulama' Islam melalui sistem Syura, dan pencalonan individu yang dipertimbangkan adalah berdasarkan sentimen masyarakat. Keempat-empat Khulafak Ar-Raasyidin merupakan individu yang paling disegani dan dihormati pada ketika itu, maka mereka jugalah yang terpilih sebagai pemimpin.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, Presiden Amerika yang ke-32 pernah berkata, "Demokrasi hanya akan berjaya jika mereka yang menyuarakan pilihan mereka mampu membuat pilihan dengan bijak. Oleh itu, demi menjaga demokrasi, pendidikan adalah penting". Oleh yang demikian, seseorang itu patut memilih pemimpin bukan atas nama parti, atau kesetiaan kepada parti, namun ia patut dilakukan kerana calon itulah yang terbaik. Setiap individu patut diberi peluang untuk bersuara. Seseorang pemimpin itu mestilah individu yang paling layak dan terbaik.

My unpublished letter (or article) which I sent to Utusan...I tried so hard to make it professional...haih.Why Utusan??why!!?